Workers’ Comp Myths That Cost Employees Thousands

Workers' Comp Myths That Cost Employees Thousands
Image by prostooleh on Freepik

Workers’ compensation is supposed to protect employees. You get hurt at work, you file a claim, you get medical treatment and partial wage replacement. Simple system. Except it’s not. Myths about what will happen if you report an injury keep people from using it properly. Fear of retaliation. Doubt about whether the injury is serious enough. Confusion about how the process works. 

These misconceptions cost real money. Employees who could be getting benefits don’t file claims. Employees who file do so incorrectly. The system exists to help them, but they’re afraid to use it. Learning the truth about workers’ compensation means the difference between getting covered and getting nothing.

Misinformation about workers’ comp circulates constantly. Someone heard a story about a friend who got fired after filing. Someone read something online about how hard it is to get benefits. The stories get repeated until they become accepted truth. But they’re often wrong. The actual system offers more protection than the myths suggest.

Understanding what workers’ comp actually is, what it actually covers, and what protections actually exist helps employees make better decisions. The myths exist partly because workers’ comp is complicated. Partly because employers benefit when employees don’t file claims. Partly because fear is easier to spread than accurate information.

Myth One: Reporting Gets You in Trouble

The first myth says that reporting a work injury will get you fired or cause retaliation. This myth costs employers nothing to spread because scared employees stay quiet. But it’s illegal for employers to retaliate against employees for filing workers’ comp claims. The law explicitly prohibits firing, demoting, reducing hours, or otherwise punishing an employee for reporting an injury and filing a claim.

What makes the myth believable is that retaliation does sometimes happen. An employer fires someone a few weeks after a workers’ comp claim gets filed. The employee thinks it’s retaliation. Sometimes it actually is. But proving retaliation requires showing timing and causation. An employer who fires an employee immediately after a claim looks suspicious. An employer who waits several months and has documented performance problems is harder to prove guilty.

Prompt reporting actually prevents retaliation problems. When you report immediately and follow procedures correctly, you create a record. The employer knows their actions are being scrutinized. Employers that think they can get away with secret retaliation behave differently than employers who know the employee has documented a claim. Reporting protects you more than staying silent does.

Myth Two: You Can’t Choose Your Doctor

The second myth says that once you file a workers’ comp claim, the insurance company controls everything medical. They choose the doctor. They decide what treatment you get. You have no say. This myth is partially true and partially false. How it works varies depending on state rules and whether the employer has a preferred provider network.

In North Carolina and most states, employers often select the initial treating physician if they have a preferred provider. But you have the right to request a change. If the doctor isn’t helping or if you don’t trust them, you can ask for a different doctor. The insurance company can’t unreasonably deny a request for a change. You have more control than the myth suggests.

Additionally, if you’re dissatisfied with how your case is being handled by the insurance company’s doctor, you have the right to get a second opinion at your own expense. If that second opinion contradicts the insurance company’s doctor, it becomes evidence in your case. You’re not powerless. You have more options than the myth acknowledges.

Myth Three: Small Injuries Don’t Count

The third myth says that minor injuries won’t qualify for workers’ comp. You have to have something serious. A small strain isn’t worth reporting. This myth prevents people from getting treatment and benefits for injuries that seem minor until they get worse. A small strain can develop into chronic pain. A minor injury can hide a more serious underlying condition.

Workers’ comp covers injury and disease that arise out of employment. That’s the standard. Minor injuries can absolutely meet that standard. A sprained ankle at work qualifies. A strained back qualifies. A cut that needs stitches qualifies. These injuries might heal quickly and not cost much, but they still qualify. Filing a claim doesn’t mean you’ll get huge benefits. It means you’ll get coverage for medical treatment and temporary wage replacement while you recover.

Some minor injuries develop into major problems over time. A worker reports a small workplace strain and gets initial treatment. The strain doesn’t heal properly. Six months later it’s causing significant pain and disability. If they’d reported promptly, the claim is already filed. If they’d waited because they thought it was minor, they might have missed the window to file, depending on state rules.

Knowledge Versus Fear

Replacing myths with facts means employees make better decisions about reporting and getting treatment. An employee who knows they have the right to report without retaliation makes different choices than one who’s afraid. An employee who understands they have some control over medical care engages differently with that care. An employee who knows minor injuries count gets treatment promptly instead of suffering through and hoping it resolves.

The system only works when employees actually use it. The protection only exists if people claim it. Fear keeps people from claiming protection they’re legally entitled to. Accurate information gives them permission to take care of themselves and use the system as intended.


The content published on this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, health or other professional advice.


Total
0
Shares
Prev
Why High-Income Earners in Ireland Must Approach Pensions Differently
high-income earners

Why High-Income Earners in Ireland Must Approach Pensions Differently

Having a higher income offers clear advantages, but it requires careful

Next
When a Chatbot Knows the Law: Promise and Peril for Attorneys
When a Chatbot Knows the Law

When a Chatbot Knows the Law: Promise and Peril for Attorneys

ChatGPT can draft contracts

You May Also Like